https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304718 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 was not negatived merely because the alleged offence occurred outside India, where the respondents were within reach of the writ court and the relief was sought against authorities in the State. Prior sanction of the Central Government was held unnecessary for investigation under Section 188 CrPC; the proviso was treated as applying only to inquiry or trial, not to the preliminary investigative stage. The contrary view of the Single Judge was rejected, and the authorities were directed to complete the investigation according to law. en-us Wed, 21 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Oct 2022 17:17:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304718 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 was not negatived merely because the alleged offence occurred outside India, where the respondents were within reach of the writ court and the relief was sought against authorities in the State. Prior sanction of the Central Government was held unnecessary for investigation under Section 188 CrPC; the proviso was treated as applying only to inquiry or trial, not to the preliminary investigative stage. The contrary view of the Single Judge was rejected, and the authorities were directed to complete the investigation according to law. Case-Laws FEMA Wed, 21 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304718