https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304717 In second appeal, the High Court's jurisdiction is confined to substantial questions of law under Section 100 CPC, so it cannot reappreciate admissible oral and documentary evidence or disturb concurrent findings of fact merely because another view appears possible. Where the trial court and first appellate court have recorded concurrent factual findings without legal error, procedural defect, lack of evidence, or perversity, those findings remain final in second appeal. The High Court had exceeded those limits by reassessing the evidence, and its judgment was therefore unsustainable; the concurrent decrees in favour of the appellant were restored. en-us Tue, 12 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Oct 2022 15:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304717 In second appeal, the High Court's jurisdiction is confined to substantial questions of law under Section 100 CPC, so it cannot reappreciate admissible oral and documentary evidence or disturb concurrent findings of fact merely because another view appears possible. Where the trial court and first appellate court have recorded concurrent factual findings without legal error, procedural defect, lack of evidence, or perversity, those findings remain final in second appeal. The High Court had exceeded those limits by reassessing the evidence, and its judgment was therefore unsustainable; the concurrent decrees in favour of the appellant were restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304717