<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 616 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429058</link>
    <description>On construction of the agreements, the assessee was treated as having become the owner of the plant and machinery, and the lease rentals were held to be taxable as revenue receipt and accrued income. The Court found no reason to interfere with the High Court&#039;s conclusion sustaining taxability, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 616 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429058</link>
      <description>On construction of the agreements, the assessee was treated as having become the owner of the plant and machinery, and the lease rentals were held to be taxable as revenue receipt and accrued income. The Court found no reason to interfere with the High Court&#039;s conclusion sustaining taxability, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>