<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 579 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429021</link>
    <description>Paraffin/wax used in cotton yarn manufacture was treated as an input or raw material, but the exemption under Notification No. 8/97-C.E. was still denied on the merits. The extended period of limitation could not be invoked because the legal position was clarified only later and suppression of true particulars was not established. The demand was therefore confined to the period within limitation, with the time-barred portion excluded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 579 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429021</link>
      <description>Paraffin/wax used in cotton yarn manufacture was treated as an input or raw material, but the exemption under Notification No. 8/97-C.E. was still denied on the merits. The extended period of limitation could not be invoked because the legal position was clarified only later and suppression of true particulars was not established. The demand was therefore confined to the period within limitation, with the time-barred portion excluded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>