<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 235 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30688</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Tax Case appeal, holding that a debatable issue cannot be rectified under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act. It was established that only errors apparent on the face of the record can be rectified through legal procedures, and decisions on debatable points of law do not qualify as such errors. Previous Supreme Court decisions were cited to support this principle, leading to the conclusion that there was no substantial question of law to entertain the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 235 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30688</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Tax Case appeal, holding that a debatable issue cannot be rectified under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act. It was established that only errors apparent on the face of the record can be rectified through legal procedures, and decisions on debatable points of law do not qualify as such errors. Previous Supreme Court decisions were cited to support this principle, leading to the conclusion that there was no substantial question of law to entertain the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>