<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 574 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429016</link>
    <description>In serious offences, regular bail under Section 439(1) CrPC must be granted only after considering the nature of the accusation, severity of punishment, prima facie material, likelihood of tampering with evidence, and the risk of obstructing justice. The text states that bail should not be granted mechanically or on parity alone without assessing the accused&#039;s individual role. It further notes that where the accused was named as the main assailant, weapon recovery and the victim&#039;s statement implicated him, and criminal antecedents were ignored, the bail order reflected non-application of mind and became unsustainable. The stated principle is that appellate courts may interfere where relevant factors are overlooked and bail is granted on irrelevant considerations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2022 18:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 574 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429016</link>
      <description>In serious offences, regular bail under Section 439(1) CrPC must be granted only after considering the nature of the accusation, severity of punishment, prima facie material, likelihood of tampering with evidence, and the risk of obstructing justice. The text states that bail should not be granted mechanically or on parity alone without assessing the accused&#039;s individual role. It further notes that where the accused was named as the main assailant, weapon recovery and the victim&#039;s statement implicated him, and criminal antecedents were ignored, the bail order reflected non-application of mind and became unsustainable. The stated principle is that appellate courts may interfere where relevant factors are overlooked and bail is granted on irrelevant considerations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>