<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 279 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30687</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Stay application in a case concerning Service Tax demands on reimbursements for &#039;Management Consultancy Services&#039; and &#039;Repair and Maintenance.&#039; The appellants&#039; arguments, supported by legal precedents, challenged the demands, citing non-taxable nature of reimbursements and the time-bar defense due to the Department&#039;s knowledge. The Tribunal found merit in the appellants&#039; contentions, noting the lack of detailed analysis in the Commissioner&#039;s order and stayed the recovery pending appeal disposal, emphasizing no recovery even post Stay Order expiry. An expedited hearing was scheduled, considering the significant revenue involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 14:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 279 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30687</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Stay application in a case concerning Service Tax demands on reimbursements for &#039;Management Consultancy Services&#039; and &#039;Repair and Maintenance.&#039; The appellants&#039; arguments, supported by legal precedents, challenged the demands, citing non-taxable nature of reimbursements and the time-bar defense due to the Department&#039;s knowledge. The Tribunal found merit in the appellants&#039; contentions, noting the lack of detailed analysis in the Commissioner&#039;s order and stayed the recovery pending appeal disposal, emphasizing no recovery even post Stay Order expiry. An expedited hearing was scheduled, considering the significant revenue involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>