<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s Order on Bogus Share Capital Criticized for Lack of Detailed Reasoning u/s 68.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66077</link>
    <description>Addition u/s 68 - Bogus share capital including share premium - The order of the CIT(A) is a non-speaking order. By simply reproducing the contents of the case laws without discussing about their application on the facts of the case, in our view, would not make the order of the ld. CIT(A) justifiable speaking order and hence, the same is not sustainable as per law.- AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2022 17:15:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2022 17:15:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s Order on Bogus Share Capital Criticized for Lack of Detailed Reasoning u/s 68.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66077</link>
      <description>Addition u/s 68 - Bogus share capital including share premium - The order of the CIT(A) is a non-speaking order. By simply reproducing the contents of the case laws without discussing about their application on the facts of the case, in our view, would not make the order of the ld. CIT(A) justifiable speaking order and hence, the same is not sustainable as per law.- AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2022 17:15:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>