<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 158 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30685</link>
    <description>The commentary explains that, for service tax purposes, the definition of &quot;tour operator&quot; was treated as broader under the amended Section 65(115) than under the earlier Section 65(52). For the earlier period, prima facie coverage depended on operation of the vehicle under a permit issued under the Motor Vehicles Act, and not necessarily on compliance with Rule 128 specifications and comfort standards. For the post-October 2004 period, the phrase &quot;any mode of transport&quot; was read as dispensing with a specific vehicle-specification requirement. On waiver of pre-deposit, unsupported pleas of limitation and financial hardship were rejected, and only partial interim relief was granted subject to reduced pre-deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 158 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30685</link>
      <description>The commentary explains that, for service tax purposes, the definition of &quot;tour operator&quot; was treated as broader under the amended Section 65(115) than under the earlier Section 65(52). For the earlier period, prima facie coverage depended on operation of the vehicle under a permit issued under the Motor Vehicles Act, and not necessarily on compliance with Rule 128 specifications and comfort standards. For the post-October 2004 period, the phrase &quot;any mode of transport&quot; was read as dispensing with a specific vehicle-specification requirement. On waiver of pre-deposit, unsupported pleas of limitation and financial hardship were rejected, and only partial interim relief was granted subject to reduced pre-deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>