<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1217 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304697</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that section 50C&#039;s provisions are limited to the computation of capital gains for the transferor and cannot be extended to the buyer for sections 69 and 69B purposes. Without specific evidence of undisclosed investment, no addition could be made under sections 69 or 69B. Consequently, the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2022 14:16:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1217 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304697</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that section 50C&#039;s provisions are limited to the computation of capital gains for the transferor and cannot be extended to the buyer for sections 69 and 69B purposes. Without specific evidence of undisclosed investment, no addition could be made under sections 69 or 69B. Consequently, the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>