https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304695 The court allowed the appeal filed by the accused against the judgment and sentence passed in CC No. 329 of 1991. The lower court's decision was set aside as the court found that the complainant had agreed to receive payment in installments as per an agreement (Ex.D1), which altered the terms of the initial cheque payment (Ex.P1). Consequently, the accused could not be held liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Criminal Revision Case filed by the complainant on the adequacy of the sentence was dismissed, as no case was established against the accused based on the circumstances and agreements between the parties. en-us Fri, 20 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Nov 2022 16:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304695 The court allowed the appeal filed by the accused against the judgment and sentence passed in CC No. 329 of 1991. The lower court's decision was set aside as the court found that the complainant had agreed to receive payment in installments as per an agreement (Ex.D1), which altered the terms of the initial cheque payment (Ex.P1). Consequently, the accused could not be held liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Criminal Revision Case filed by the complainant on the adequacy of the sentence was dismissed, as no case was established against the accused based on the circumstances and agreements between the parties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304695