<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 558 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429000</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, directing the assessing officer to delete the disallowance of PF/ESIC contributions made before the due date for filing the return of income under section 139(1) for the assessment year 2019-20. The tribunal held that the amendment to section 36(1)(va) by the Finance Act, 2021, is prospective and does not apply retrospectively, citing judicial precedents supporting deductions for contributions made before the due date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2022 10:44:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 558 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429000</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, directing the assessing officer to delete the disallowance of PF/ESIC contributions made before the due date for filing the return of income under section 139(1) for the assessment year 2019-20. The tribunal held that the amendment to section 36(1)(va) by the Finance Act, 2021, is prospective and does not apply retrospectively, citing judicial precedents supporting deductions for contributions made before the due date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>