https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428988 The appellant's challenges regarding assessments for AY 2010-11 and AY 2011-12, including unexplained cash deposits, disallowances, and unexplained credits, were partially upheld by the Ld. CIT(A) but ultimately dismissed by the Tribunal due to lack of substantial evidence. Despite the allowance of additional evidence submissions, the appellant failed to provide convincing material to support their contentions. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant's responsibility to present credible evidence, leading to the dismissal of both appeals. en-us Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Oct 2022 09:11:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428988 The appellant's challenges regarding assessments for AY 2010-11 and AY 2011-12, including unexplained cash deposits, disallowances, and unexplained credits, were partially upheld by the Ld. CIT(A) but ultimately dismissed by the Tribunal due to lack of substantial evidence. Despite the allowance of additional evidence submissions, the appellant failed to provide convincing material to support their contentions. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant's responsibility to present credible evidence, leading to the dismissal of both appeals. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428988