<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 537 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428979</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, dismissed the assessee&#039;s cross objection, and restored the issue of deduction of leave encashment u/s.43B(f) to the AO for both the current and previous assessment years. The Tribunal directed verification of fresh evidences for claim u/s.35AD, certification in Form 3CD for deduction u/s.35AD, and the leave encashment deduction issue based on legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2022 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 537 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428979</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, dismissed the assessee&#039;s cross objection, and restored the issue of deduction of leave encashment u/s.43B(f) to the AO for both the current and previous assessment years. The Tribunal directed verification of fresh evidences for claim u/s.35AD, certification in Form 3CD for deduction u/s.35AD, and the leave encashment deduction issue based on legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>