https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428973 The court dismissed the application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC seeking rejection of the plaint. It held that the plaintiff had sufficiently averred and provided supporting documents to establish the property was purchased from HUF funds, necessitating a trial for verification. The court emphasized that issues raised could not be resolved at the preliminary stage and required a full trial. The defendant's arguments were deemed inapplicable to the case, leading to the rejection of the application and scheduling of trial proceedings before the Joint Registrar. en-us Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Oct 2022 09:10:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428973 The court dismissed the application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC seeking rejection of the plaint. It held that the plaintiff had sufficiently averred and provided supporting documents to establish the property was purchased from HUF funds, necessitating a trial for verification. The court emphasized that issues raised could not be resolved at the preliminary stage and required a full trial. The defendant's arguments were deemed inapplicable to the case, leading to the rejection of the application and scheduling of trial proceedings before the Joint Registrar. Case-Laws Benami Property Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428973