<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 195 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30677</link>
    <description>The Court held that interest and remuneration paid to partners, deductible under Section 40(b) of the Income Tax Act, should not be included in Gross Total Income for the purpose of deduction under Section 80HH. The Court distinguished a prior judgment, noting the amendment in Section 40(b) by the Finance Act, 1992. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision, with no costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 195 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30677</link>
      <description>The Court held that interest and remuneration paid to partners, deductible under Section 40(b) of the Income Tax Act, should not be included in Gross Total Income for the purpose of deduction under Section 80HH. The Court distinguished a prior judgment, noting the amendment in Section 40(b) by the Finance Act, 1992. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision, with no costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>