<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 521 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428963</link>
    <description>The Tribunal admitted the Company Petition, ordering the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor. An Interim Resolution Professional was appointed, and initial CIRP costs were specified. The Tribunal imposed restrictions on legal actions against the Corporate Debtor, ensuring continuity of essential services during the moratorium period. Management vested in the IRP/RP during CIRP, with necessary notifications directed to relevant authorities. The Tribunal rejected the Corporate Debtor&#039;s limitation plea and defense of pre-existing disputes, finding them unsubstantiated. The Registry was instructed to promptly communicate the order to all parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2022 09:09:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 521 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428963</link>
      <description>The Tribunal admitted the Company Petition, ordering the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor. An Interim Resolution Professional was appointed, and initial CIRP costs were specified. The Tribunal imposed restrictions on legal actions against the Corporate Debtor, ensuring continuity of essential services during the moratorium period. Management vested in the IRP/RP during CIRP, with necessary notifications directed to relevant authorities. The Tribunal rejected the Corporate Debtor&#039;s limitation plea and defense of pre-existing disputes, finding them unsubstantiated. The Registry was instructed to promptly communicate the order to all parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>