https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428959 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order confirming a service tax demand for the assessment period 2016-17. The petitioner's contentions regarding non-receipt of notice for personal hearing and absence of service tax evasion were not upheld. The Court found the lack of response to the show-cause notice insufficient to establish a violation of natural justice warranting intervention under Article 226. The order-in-original was deemed appealable under Section 85 of the Finance Act, directing the petitioner to pursue remedies through the appellate process while maintaining neutrality on the substantive issues. en-us Mon, 10 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Oct 2022 09:09:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428959 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order confirming a service tax demand for the assessment period 2016-17. The petitioner's contentions regarding non-receipt of notice for personal hearing and absence of service tax evasion were not upheld. The Court found the lack of response to the show-cause notice insufficient to establish a violation of natural justice warranting intervention under Article 226. The order-in-original was deemed appealable under Section 85 of the Finance Act, directing the petitioner to pursue remedies through the appellate process while maintaining neutrality on the substantive issues. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 10 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428959