<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 513 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428955</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit was held admissible on HR Sheets, HR Plates and MS Rods used to fabricate Steel Formers that operated as furnace liners and were consumed during manufacture of billets. The Tribunal applied the settled test that an item qualifies as an input if it is used in relation to manufacture and is essential to the process, even if it does not remain in the finished product. It treated the impugned goods as functionally connected with manufacture because they were used to make a consumable item indispensable to the induction furnace process. The denial of credit, and the consequential demand and penalty, were therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2022 18:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 513 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428955</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit was held admissible on HR Sheets, HR Plates and MS Rods used to fabricate Steel Formers that operated as furnace liners and were consumed during manufacture of billets. The Tribunal applied the settled test that an item qualifies as an input if it is used in relation to manufacture and is essential to the process, even if it does not remain in the finished product. It treated the impugned goods as functionally connected with manufacture because they were used to make a consumable item indispensable to the induction furnace process. The denial of credit, and the consequential demand and penalty, were therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>