<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 507 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428949</link>
    <description>CGST authorities issued a notice requesting financial documents for audit purposes. The petitioners challenged the notice, arguing redundancy due to prior audits. HC found no legal prohibition against initiating anti-evasion proceedings and determined the notice was procedurally sound. The court declined to interfere with the investigation, dismissing the writ petition without substantive legal objections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 15:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 507 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428949</link>
      <description>CGST authorities issued a notice requesting financial documents for audit purposes. The petitioners challenged the notice, arguing redundancy due to prior audits. HC found no legal prohibition against initiating anti-evasion proceedings and determined the notice was procedurally sound. The court declined to interfere with the investigation, dismissing the writ petition without substantive legal objections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>