<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 86 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30672</link>
    <description>A departmental circular cannot override Regulation 3 of the Customs (Fees for Rendering Services by Customs Officers) Regulations, 1998. Merchant Over Time charges were held not recoverable for supervision of stuffing work performed during officers&#039; normal office working hours, because the governing regulations did not permit such levy. The circular was therefore unenforceable in law, and the refund claim for charges paid on that basis was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 86 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30672</link>
      <description>A departmental circular cannot override Regulation 3 of the Customs (Fees for Rendering Services by Customs Officers) Regulations, 1998. Merchant Over Time charges were held not recoverable for supervision of stuffing work performed during officers&#039; normal office working hours, because the governing regulations did not permit such levy. The circular was therefore unenforceable in law, and the refund claim for charges paid on that basis was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>