<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court Rules High Court Erred in Granting Unclaimed Tax Benefits u/s 10(20) of Income Tax Act, 1961.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66049</link>
    <description>Grant of benefit under Section 10(20) - When even respondent/Assessee never claimed the benefit under Section 10(20) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the High Court is not justified in dismissing the appeals by granting the benefit to the respondent/Assessee under Section 10(20) of the IT Act. - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2022 15:53:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2022 15:53:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Rules High Court Erred in Granting Unclaimed Tax Benefits u/s 10(20) of Income Tax Act, 1961.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66049</link>
      <description>Grant of benefit under Section 10(20) - When even respondent/Assessee never claimed the benefit under Section 10(20) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the High Court is not justified in dismissing the appeals by granting the benefit to the respondent/Assessee under Section 10(20) of the IT Act. - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2022 15:53:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>