<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 155 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30671</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding a refund claim for short-shipment of goods, upholding the decisions of the lower authorities. The rejection was based on the timing of the refund claim post-clearance, absence of challenge to the assessment, and lack of department involvement in the survey establishing short-shipment. The tribunal emphasized adherence to legal procedures and denied the claim for refund based on subsequent events, affirming the original denial decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 155 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30671</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding a refund claim for short-shipment of goods, upholding the decisions of the lower authorities. The rejection was based on the timing of the refund claim post-clearance, absence of challenge to the assessment, and lack of department involvement in the survey establishing short-shipment. The tribunal emphasized adherence to legal procedures and denied the claim for refund based on subsequent events, affirming the original denial decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>