<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 505 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428947</link>
    <description>HC quashed the order rejecting the petitioner&#039;s GST refund application for textile business. The court found the respondent&#039;s rejection order lacking substantive reasoning and without proper consideration of limitation periods. HC remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing respondent to provide a personal hearing and complete the process within three months, emphasizing principles of natural justice in tax refund proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 505 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428947</link>
      <description>HC quashed the order rejecting the petitioner&#039;s GST refund application for textile business. The court found the respondent&#039;s rejection order lacking substantive reasoning and without proper consideration of limitation periods. HC remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing respondent to provide a personal hearing and complete the process within three months, emphasizing principles of natural justice in tax refund proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>