<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 484 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428926</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals by the Revenue, remanding the matters to the CIT(A) for de novo adjudication. The CIT(A) was directed to share information received under section 131 with the AO, allow cross-examination of the broker&#039;s representatives, and provide both parties the opportunity to present their case. The Tribunal emphasized natural justice principles and the importance of fair examination of evidence and testimonies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2022 08:48:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 484 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428926</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals by the Revenue, remanding the matters to the CIT(A) for de novo adjudication. The CIT(A) was directed to share information received under section 131 with the AO, allow cross-examination of the broker&#039;s representatives, and provide both parties the opportunity to present their case. The Tribunal emphasized natural justice principles and the importance of fair examination of evidence and testimonies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>