<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 481 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428923</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the classification of the land as a capital asset but remanding the issue of deduction under section 54F back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The Tribunal also condoned the delay in filing the appeal, allowing it to be heard on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2022 08:48:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 481 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428923</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the classification of the land as a capital asset but remanding the issue of deduction under section 54F back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The Tribunal also condoned the delay in filing the appeal, allowing it to be heard on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>