<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 467 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428909</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the petitioner to file a review petition before the High Court to challenge the previous judgment based on distinguishing factors. The Court did not express an opinion on the correctness of the submission but granted permission for further legal proceedings. The special leave petition was disposed of, and any pending applications were resolved in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2022 08:47:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 467 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428909</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the petitioner to file a review petition before the High Court to challenge the previous judgment based on distinguishing factors. The Court did not express an opinion on the correctness of the submission but granted permission for further legal proceedings. The special leave petition was disposed of, and any pending applications were resolved in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>