<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 2282 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304675</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Appellants-Revenue challenging the exclusion of comparables Kals Information Systems Ltd and Bodhtree Consulting Ltd. The Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision that the comparables were functionally dissimilar to the assessee. Additionally, the Court affirmed the ITAT&#039;s ruling on the disallowance of software expenses claimed by the assessee, stating that such expenses were revenue expenditure due to their nature of enhancing business operations&#039; efficiency without creating enduring benefits. The Court concluded that no substantial question of law arose in this case, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2022 08:46:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 2282 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304675</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Appellants-Revenue challenging the exclusion of comparables Kals Information Systems Ltd and Bodhtree Consulting Ltd. The Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision that the comparables were functionally dissimilar to the assessee. Additionally, the Court affirmed the ITAT&#039;s ruling on the disallowance of software expenses claimed by the assessee, stating that such expenses were revenue expenditure due to their nature of enhancing business operations&#039; efficiency without creating enduring benefits. The Court concluded that no substantial question of law arose in this case, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>