<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 443 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428885</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of a penalty on Shri Vaibhav Goel for his active involvement in managing M/s. Goel Enterprises and M/s. Seguro Traders in exporting goods under investigation. The classification of impugned goods was upheld, rejecting the appellant&#039;s argument on the notice&#039;s scope. Both firms were found involved in fraudulent activities, leading to penalties. Shri Vaibhav Goel&#039;s active role justified penalty imposition despite attempts to disassociate. Proceedings against deceased proprietor Mr. Krishan Goel were abated due to his death, resulting in modifications to the order and confirmation of demand against M/s. Goel Enterprises.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 08:28:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 443 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428885</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of a penalty on Shri Vaibhav Goel for his active involvement in managing M/s. Goel Enterprises and M/s. Seguro Traders in exporting goods under investigation. The classification of impugned goods was upheld, rejecting the appellant&#039;s argument on the notice&#039;s scope. Both firms were found involved in fraudulent activities, leading to penalties. Shri Vaibhav Goel&#039;s active role justified penalty imposition despite attempts to disassociate. Proceedings against deceased proprietor Mr. Krishan Goel were abated due to his death, resulting in modifications to the order and confirmation of demand against M/s. Goel Enterprises.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>