https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428882 The Tribunal directed the respondent to complete necessary compliances under Rule 25A within two weeks, including filing E-Form 22A with digital signatures and payment of fees/penalties. The decision emphasized directors' legal obligations, compliance with statutory requirements, and protection of shareholder interests and company survival. Despite a directorial dispute, both directors were mandated to fulfill their duties under the Companies Act, 2013. The order aimed to ensure the company's active status and highlighted the importance of maintaining compliance regardless of internal management conflicts. en-us Mon, 19 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Oct 2022 18:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428882 The Tribunal directed the respondent to complete necessary compliances under Rule 25A within two weeks, including filing E-Form 22A with digital signatures and payment of fees/penalties. The decision emphasized directors' legal obligations, compliance with statutory requirements, and protection of shareholder interests and company survival. Despite a directorial dispute, both directors were mandated to fulfill their duties under the Companies Act, 2013. The order aimed to ensure the company's active status and highlighted the importance of maintaining compliance regardless of internal management conflicts. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 19 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428882