<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 6 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30659</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the respondent to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue a statutory appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals), and the impugned High Court order was set aside. The appeal was then dismissed as withdrawn. The operative effect is that the dispute was redirected to the statutory appellate remedy rather than being pursued through the writ route.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 6 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30659</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the respondent to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue a statutory appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals), and the impugned High Court order was set aside. The appeal was then dismissed as withdrawn. The operative effect is that the dispute was redirected to the statutory appellate remedy rather than being pursued through the writ route.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>