<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 434 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428876</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed to the extent of setting aside the order directing the Resolution Professional (RP) to pay the entire rent amount. The Tribunal clarified that the RP was only liable for rent post-Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). Adverse observations against the RP were not expunged. The appeal was disposed of with these determinations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 20:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 434 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428876</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed to the extent of setting aside the order directing the Resolution Professional (RP) to pay the entire rent amount. The Tribunal clarified that the RP was only liable for rent post-Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). Adverse observations against the RP were not expunged. The appeal was disposed of with these determinations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>