<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 424 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428866</link>
    <description>SC held that where a post-dated cheque is issued but the drawer makes part-payment after the cheque is drawn and before presentation, the legally enforceable debt at maturity is reduced and the cheque&#039;s face value may not represent the debt. Consequently, statutory presumption under Section 138 is rebutted if the cheque did not represent the enforceable debt when dishonoured for insufficiency. The trial court&#039;s acquittal was affirmed and the appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 424 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428866</link>
      <description>SC held that where a post-dated cheque is issued but the drawer makes part-payment after the cheque is drawn and before presentation, the legally enforceable debt at maturity is reduced and the cheque&#039;s face value may not represent the debt. Consequently, statutory presumption under Section 138 is rebutted if the cheque did not represent the enforceable debt when dishonoured for insufficiency. The trial court&#039;s acquittal was affirmed and the appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>