<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1839 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304658</link>
    <description>The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, with specific directions to the TPO regarding capacity utilization adjustment and the inclusion of NGEF as a comparable. The software expenses were allowed as revenue expenditure. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under Section 10A was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 08:26:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1839 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304658</link>
      <description>The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, with specific directions to the TPO regarding capacity utilization adjustment and the inclusion of NGEF as a comparable. The software expenses were allowed as revenue expenditure. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under Section 10A was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>