<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 63 - HIGH COURT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30656</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s refund direction was left undisturbed because it had given a reasoned finding that the authorities unjustly withheld the amount payable and acted contrary to natural justice. The High Court found no basis to interfere with that conclusion and held that no substantial question of law arose on the record. The challenge to the refund in cash from the personal ledger account therefore failed, and the Tribunal&#039;s order was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 63 - HIGH COURT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30656</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s refund direction was left undisturbed because it had given a reasoned finding that the authorities unjustly withheld the amount payable and acted contrary to natural justice. The High Court found no basis to interfere with that conclusion and held that no substantial question of law arose on the record. The challenge to the refund in cash from the personal ledger account therefore failed, and the Tribunal&#039;s order was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>