<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 1022 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304655</link>
    <description>Land acquisition proceedings remain valid where the date borne by a Section 4 Gazette notification is supported by the presumption of regularity and no reliable evidence rebuts publication on that date. Local publication is satisfied by proved announcement in the locality, supported by contemporaneous records and landowners&#039; objections. Later acquisition notifications do not automatically supersede earlier notifications where they concern other land and do not annul the prior acquisition. Purchasers and collaborators acquiring interests after the preliminary notification take subject to acquisition and cannot challenge it, although compensation may remain available. Differential land release does not establish discrimination without comparable land and absence of a rational planning distinction. Sewerage-connectivity concerns require removal of administrative impediments and effective redressal steps.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2022 16:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 1022 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304655</link>
      <description>Land acquisition proceedings remain valid where the date borne by a Section 4 Gazette notification is supported by the presumption of regularity and no reliable evidence rebuts publication on that date. Local publication is satisfied by proved announcement in the locality, supported by contemporaneous records and landowners&#039; objections. Later acquisition notifications do not automatically supersede earlier notifications where they concern other land and do not annul the prior acquisition. Purchasers and collaborators acquiring interests after the preliminary notification take subject to acquisition and cannot challenge it, although compensation may remain available. Differential land release does not establish discrimination without comparable land and absence of a rational planning distinction. Sewerage-connectivity concerns require removal of administrative impediments and effective redressal steps.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>