https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304655 The article states that a Section 4 notification under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is treated as published on the date it bears unless the statutory presumption of regularity is rebutted, and that local publication is satisfied where the record as a whole shows announcement in the locality. It further notes that later notifications did not supersede the earlier acquisition, that subsequent purchasers or collaborators could not challenge the acquisition after the Section 4 notice, and that differential release of parcels did not establish discrimination absent comparable facts. The older writ petitions therefore failed, while the connected writ on sewerage connectivity was disposed of with directions to remove the administrative impediment and take effective steps for redressal. en-us Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Oct 2022 16:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304655 The article states that a Section 4 notification under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is treated as published on the date it bears unless the statutory presumption of regularity is rebutted, and that local publication is satisfied where the record as a whole shows announcement in the locality. It further notes that later notifications did not supersede the earlier acquisition, that subsequent purchasers or collaborators could not challenge the acquisition after the Section 4 notice, and that differential release of parcels did not establish discrimination absent comparable facts. The older writ petitions therefore failed, while the connected writ on sewerage connectivity was disposed of with directions to remove the administrative impediment and take effective steps for redressal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304655