<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 422 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428864</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the impugned assessment orders due to the non-issuance of Show Cause Notice (SCN)/Draft Assessment Order (DAO) under Section 144B, emphasizing the mandatory nature of these procedural requirements. It held that the failure to issue SCN/DAO and provide an effective opportunity to respond violated principles of natural justice. The Court rejected the argument for seeking alternate remedies, stating that such violations could not be cured by appeals. The respondents were directed to issue SCN/DAO within four weeks, allowing the petitioners to be heard for new assessment orders within sixteen weeks. The writ petitions were allowed, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 422 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428864</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the impugned assessment orders due to the non-issuance of Show Cause Notice (SCN)/Draft Assessment Order (DAO) under Section 144B, emphasizing the mandatory nature of these procedural requirements. It held that the failure to issue SCN/DAO and provide an effective opportunity to respond violated principles of natural justice. The Court rejected the argument for seeking alternate remedies, stating that such violations could not be cured by appeals. The respondents were directed to issue SCN/DAO within four weeks, allowing the petitioners to be heard for new assessment orders within sixteen weeks. The writ petitions were allowed, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>