https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428859 The ITAT allowed the appellant's appeal against the assessment order for A.Y. 2010-11, directing the Assessing Officer to reconsider the case and granting the appellant one more opportunity to provide additional evidences. The ITAT imposed a cost of Rs. 10,000 on the appellant for lack of cooperation. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deemed infructuous due to setting aside the reassessment order, resulting in the dismissal of another appeal. The appellant was advised to furnish all necessary documents and cooperate with the Assessing Officer for a fair assessment. en-us Fri, 09 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Oct 2022 10:02:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428859 The ITAT allowed the appellant's appeal against the assessment order for A.Y. 2010-11, directing the Assessing Officer to reconsider the case and granting the appellant one more opportunity to provide additional evidences. The ITAT imposed a cost of Rs. 10,000 on the appellant for lack of cooperation. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deemed infructuous due to setting aside the reassessment order, resulting in the dismissal of another appeal. The appellant was advised to furnish all necessary documents and cooperate with the Assessing Officer for a fair assessment. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 09 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428859