<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1619 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304650</link>
    <description>The High Court granted exemption subject to just exceptions in the case. A notice was issued for the Writ Petition, with the Respondents&#039; counsel accepting it. The court directed the filing of a counter affidavit within four weeks and allowed a rejoinder. The case was scheduled for a specific date in January 2020. Regarding the stay application, the court heard both parties&#039; counsels and reviewed the impugned order. The court decided to stay the order if the Petitioner deposited a specified amount within four weeks with the Respondents. Penalty proceedings were allowed to proceed, and the deposited amount was to be placed in a fixed deposit for a year, subject to further orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 16:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1619 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304650</link>
      <description>The High Court granted exemption subject to just exceptions in the case. A notice was issued for the Writ Petition, with the Respondents&#039; counsel accepting it. The court directed the filing of a counter affidavit within four weeks and allowed a rejoinder. The case was scheduled for a specific date in January 2020. Regarding the stay application, the court heard both parties&#039; counsels and reviewed the impugned order. The court decided to stay the order if the Petitioner deposited a specified amount within four weeks with the Respondents. Penalty proceedings were allowed to proceed, and the deposited amount was to be placed in a fixed deposit for a year, subject to further orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>