https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428852 Pre-GST contracts executed before 1 July 2017 had to be assessed under the State Government Orders governing transition from VAT to GST, because those orders prescribed the method for computing GST liability on subsisting contracts and allocating any tax differential to the purchaser. The Court noted that the methodology had been consistently applied in similar matters and that the orders themselves were not under challenge. On that basis, the computation rejected by the authorities could not be sustained. The petitioner was entitled to liability computation in accordance with the Government Orders, the rejection orders were quashed, and any recovery made contrary to that methodology was directed to be refunded. en-us Thu, 29 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Apr 2025 14:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428852 Pre-GST contracts executed before 1 July 2017 had to be assessed under the State Government Orders governing transition from VAT to GST, because those orders prescribed the method for computing GST liability on subsisting contracts and allocating any tax differential to the purchaser. The Court noted that the methodology had been consistently applied in similar matters and that the orders themselves were not under challenge. On that basis, the computation rejected by the authorities could not be sustained. The petitioner was entitled to liability computation in accordance with the Government Orders, the rejection orders were quashed, and any recovery made contrary to that methodology was directed to be refunded. Case-Laws GST Thu, 29 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428852