<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 409 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428851</link>
    <description>The HC addressed jurisdictional bias in a tax case, finding procedural irregularities in a search and seizure operation. The court stayed the original order due to potential bias from the same officer conducting both investigation and adjudication. The HC directed fresh proceedings under new guidelines, setting aside the initial order and requiring a revised show cause notice, effectively providing procedural relief to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 409 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428851</link>
      <description>The HC addressed jurisdictional bias in a tax case, finding procedural irregularities in a search and seizure operation. The court stayed the original order due to potential bias from the same officer conducting both investigation and adjudication. The HC directed fresh proceedings under new guidelines, setting aside the initial order and requiring a revised show cause notice, effectively providing procedural relief to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>