<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 60 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30651</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in two appeals regarding the taxation of royalty payments to a foreign consultant for technical know-how categorized as &quot;Intellectual Property Service.&quot; The Tribunal determined that the royalty payments were not for services but for the use of technology and know-how, exempting the appellants from service tax liability. It was clarified that the Service Tax Rules did not apply retrospectively to the appellants as service receivers. The Tribunal relied on previous judgments and legal provisions to support its decision, ultimately allowing the appeals and relieving the appellants of service tax obligations on the royalty payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 16:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 60 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30651</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in two appeals regarding the taxation of royalty payments to a foreign consultant for technical know-how categorized as &quot;Intellectual Property Service.&quot; The Tribunal determined that the royalty payments were not for services but for the use of technology and know-how, exempting the appellants from service tax liability. It was clarified that the Service Tax Rules did not apply retrospectively to the appellants as service receivers. The Tribunal relied on previous judgments and legal provisions to support its decision, ultimately allowing the appeals and relieving the appellants of service tax obligations on the royalty payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>