<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 387 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428829</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the Ld.CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all issues. The Tribunal found that the assessee adequately proved the genuineness of unsecured loans, interest expenses, and purchases, with the AO failing to properly consider the evidence. The additions and disallowances made by the AO were deemed unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2022 09:55:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 387 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428829</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the Ld.CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all issues. The Tribunal found that the assessee adequately proved the genuineness of unsecured loans, interest expenses, and purchases, with the AO failing to properly consider the evidence. The additions and disallowances made by the AO were deemed unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>