<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 83 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30647</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed as the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit of service tax and penalties, finding merit in the applicant&#039;s case due to the contractor already paying the service tax. The inclusion of land value in service tax assessment was disputed, with the Tribunal noting the contractor&#039;s prior payment of service tax. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was remanded for a decision on merits, emphasizing the importance of proper consideration of the issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 83 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30647</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed as the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit of service tax and penalties, finding merit in the applicant&#039;s case due to the contractor already paying the service tax. The inclusion of land value in service tax assessment was disputed, with the Tribunal noting the contractor&#039;s prior payment of service tax. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was remanded for a decision on merits, emphasizing the importance of proper consideration of the issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>