https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304637 After a judicial sale of a vessel, anchorage charges accruing from the purchaser's post-delivery use of the anchorage were treated as tariff-based liabilities arising from the vessel's condition and continued presence, not as pre-sale encumbrances extinguished by the Admiralty Act. The court also held that anchorage fees were separate from port dues under the Major Port Trusts Act, so Section 50-B did not confine recovery to half rate. The cross objection on pilotage charges failed because no supporting liberty or finding existed. The result was that the rectification order on anchorage charges was set aside and the cross objection rejected. en-us Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Oct 2022 18:47:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304637 After a judicial sale of a vessel, anchorage charges accruing from the purchaser's post-delivery use of the anchorage were treated as tariff-based liabilities arising from the vessel's condition and continued presence, not as pre-sale encumbrances extinguished by the Admiralty Act. The court also held that anchorage fees were separate from port dues under the Major Port Trusts Act, so Section 50-B did not confine recovery to half rate. The cross objection on pilotage charges failed because no supporting liberty or finding existed. The result was that the rectification order on anchorage charges was set aside and the cross objection rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304637