<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1316 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304641</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the penalty u/s.271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was unjustified for the assessee for A.Y. 2014-15. Despite initial confusion and absence, the assessee later cooperated, providing required details. As per relevant case laws, when assessments are completed u/s.143(3) after furnishing details, penalty u/s.271(1)(b) cannot be imposed. The Tribunal directed the ld. AO to delete the penalty, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 18:47:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1316 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304641</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the penalty u/s.271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was unjustified for the assessee for A.Y. 2014-15. Despite initial confusion and absence, the assessee later cooperated, providing required details. As per relevant case laws, when assessments are completed u/s.143(3) after furnishing details, penalty u/s.271(1)(b) cannot be imposed. The Tribunal directed the ld. AO to delete the penalty, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>