<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1461 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304628</link>
    <description>The appeals for assessment years 2004-05 to 2007-08 were allowed, quashing the assessments under section 153C due to the absence of a satisfaction note. Appeals for assessment years 2008-09 and 2010-11 were remitted back to the AO to calculate the index cost of acquisition based on the outcome of the judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Gujarat High Court. Additions under section 50C were confirmed, while penalties under section 271(1)(c) were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 10:39:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1461 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304628</link>
      <description>The appeals for assessment years 2004-05 to 2007-08 were allowed, quashing the assessments under section 153C due to the absence of a satisfaction note. Appeals for assessment years 2008-09 and 2010-11 were remitted back to the AO to calculate the index cost of acquisition based on the outcome of the judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Gujarat High Court. Additions under section 50C were confirmed, while penalties under section 271(1)(c) were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>