<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 2052 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304627</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, condoning the delay and directing the AO to allow the exemption under Section 54B for the purchase of agricultural land in the name of the assessee&#039;s sons. The FMV adopted by the registered valuer was accepted, and the exemption under Section 54F was upheld as per the Departmental Valuation Officer&#039;s report. The addition of Rs. 25,51,176/- was addressed, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 10:39:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 2052 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304627</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, condoning the delay and directing the AO to allow the exemption under Section 54B for the purchase of agricultural land in the name of the assessee&#039;s sons. The FMV adopted by the registered valuer was accepted, and the exemption under Section 54F was upheld as per the Departmental Valuation Officer&#039;s report. The addition of Rs. 25,51,176/- was addressed, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>