<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 373 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428815</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. It directed that the surplus from the JDA be treated as Long Term Capital Gains and allowed the exemption under Section 54F for the multiple residential units received. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 21st September 2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 09:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 373 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428815</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. It directed that the surplus from the JDA be treated as Long Term Capital Gains and allowed the exemption under Section 54F for the multiple residential units received. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 21st September 2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>