<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 366 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428808</link>
    <description>NAPA held that the respondent builder contravened section 171 of CGST Act by failing to pass on input tax credit benefits of Rs. 9,03,74,981/- to 395 flat buyers during 01.07.2017 to 31.05.2020. The authority rejected respondent&#039;s claim of transferring Rs. 15,48,92,888/- benefit due to lack of proper methodology. NAPA determined the respondent profiteered at 5.69% of taxable amount plus 12% GST and directed penalty notice issuance for violations from 01.01.2020 onwards under section 171(3A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 14:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 366 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428808</link>
      <description>NAPA held that the respondent builder contravened section 171 of CGST Act by failing to pass on input tax credit benefits of Rs. 9,03,74,981/- to 395 flat buyers during 01.07.2017 to 31.05.2020. The authority rejected respondent&#039;s claim of transferring Rs. 15,48,92,888/- benefit due to lack of proper methodology. NAPA determined the respondent profiteered at 5.69% of taxable amount plus 12% GST and directed penalty notice issuance for violations from 01.01.2020 onwards under section 171(3A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>